Evidence before action

See how the condition
rubric reads a record.

Explore the draft scoring rules, inspect the evidence behind each result, and record a proposed correction.

Your data stays in this browser.

CSV files are read locally. This demo makes no Jev or other model request and does not store or upload your records.

Draft condition rubric · cp-triage-1.1Higher condition scores indicate stronger evidence under these provisional rules. This is not engineering approval, a compliance decision, or a field work order. Jev urgency is not evaluated here.

Normalized CSV · up to 1 MB / 1,000 records · mV, mA and ohms. Input requirements

Start with a small, synthetic survey.

Six example records show missing readings, valid zero, shorted isolation and conflicting evidence. Or open a CSV to explore your own records locally.

No account, API key or model call is required.

Read the evidence

Three results, kept separate.

Source result is the original Pass, Fail or other supplied value. Condition is the deterministic draft score. Review notes identify gaps and contradictions. The source result is never replaced by a grade.

When a reading is unavailable

Keep the gap visible.

Blank and invalid readings remain unavailable; a valid numeric zero remains evidence. Proposed alternate routes and applicability rules are still drafts and are not automatically applied.

Measurement rule register →
Human decisions

A note is a review record.

Pause a record or explain a proposed measurement correction before recalculating. These are local, unauthenticated notes. They do not grant approval or change the original source file.

Human review workflow →